TL;DR
Get beauty and skincare favorites delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Marie Claire writer who spent about $3,600 plus tip on 16 professional hair-removal sessions tested Nood’s Flasher Pro at home for a month. She reported slower, finer leg-hair growth, but this is one person’s experience, not proof of equivalent results to professional treatment; IPL also carries safety limits and risks.
Marie Claire published a first-person review of Nood’s Flasher Pro, an at-home intense pulsed light (IPL) hair-removal device, in which a writer said that after about a month her leg hair grew back more slowly and felt finer. The writer had previously spent $3,600 plus tip on 16 professional sessions, but her account is an individual experience, not evidence that the device matches professional treatment.
The reviewer said she used the device on her legs and chose intensity level three because of sensitive skin and concern about possible irritation. She described the flashes as warm, with a mild snapping sensation, and said treating both legs took about 15 minutes. She first tested a small area and waited 48 hours before treating her legs more broadly.
After roughly a month, she said she could go about a week without shaving and had little stubble, while also noting that hair continued to grow. The account does not establish how long the results will last, whether they will apply to other users, or how the device compares with professional treatment over a full course.
The review describes a recommended schedule of use every three days for eight weeks, followed by weekly treatments for four weeks and then monthly maintenance. It reports that the Flasher Pro has an output of 7 joules per square centimeter and a cooling tip. Those product specifications and the reviewer’s experience should not be taken as a guarantee of safety or effectiveness for a particular user.
What One Month of IPL Showed
The review speaks to consumers weighing the cost and convenience of professional hair-removal appointments against an at-home device. The writer’s results suggest she noticed a change in regrowth during her first month, but her account does not show that the device can replace professional sessions or that it will produce the same outcome for someone with different skin or hair characteristics.
That distinction matters because IPL works by targeting pigment in hair, and the source warns that effectiveness and risk depend partly on the contrast between skin tone and hair color. A purchase decision also involves more than the device price: users need to follow the directions and treatment schedule and account for possible skin reactions.
Products Worth Considering
BowFlex Results Series 552 SelectTech Adjustable Dumbbell
Philips Sonicare ProtectiveClean 5300 Rechargeable Electric Toothbrush with 3 Brush Heads, Black
Garmin Forerunner 570 GPS Running Smartwatch, 42 mm, Raspberry, with P-Bank Bundle
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Clinic Sessions to Home IPL
The reviewer said she had completed 16 professional sessions for $3,600 plus tip and considered those treatments worthwhile. She had wanted to treat her legs and arms as well but was reluctant to spend substantially more. After friends asked her about at-home devices, she researched options and tried the Flasher Pro, according to her Marie Claire report.
The device uses intense pulsed light, not the same treatment experience as the professional laser sessions the writer described. The review cites dermatologist Joshua Zeichner explaining that IPL emits broad-spectrum light that heats targeted hair follicles. It says results tend to be better when there is high contrast between skin and hair pigment, and that blonde, red, or gray hair may respond less well. The article also notes that darker skin tones may face added risk with these devices.
““I’ve been using it for a month and am pretty shocked by the results.””
— Marie Claire reviewer
Long-Term Results Remain Unknown
The supplied report covers about one month of use by one reviewer. It does not provide independently verified trial results, a comparison with professional treatment, or evidence about how durable the reported change will be. The reviewer also said her skin was pale and her hair light brown, so her response may not predict outcomes for people with other skin tones or hair colors.
The source warns that at-home IPL can cause injury, burns, or unwanted pigmentation and says the device should be avoided by people with blonde, red, or gray hair or deep/dark skin tones. It does not provide a full account of contraindications, adverse-event rates, or which users should seek medical advice before treatment. The article’s reference to FDA clearance is not, by itself, a guarantee that a device is appropriate or risk-free for every person.
Follow the Full Treatment Schedule
The reviewer’s reported schedule continues beyond the first month: treatment every three days for eight weeks, then weekly for four weeks, followed by monthly maintenance. The supplied report does not include results at the end of that course, so any later assessment of durability or additional hair reduction remains outstanding.
People considering home IPL should read the device instructions and assess whether their skin and hair characteristics are suitable before use. The reviewer’s own approach included a small test spot and a 48-hour wait, but that personal practice does not replace the manufacturer’s safety directions or professional guidance when a user has concerns about their skin.
Key Questions
What did the Marie Claire reviewer report after a month?
She said her leg hair grew back more slowly and felt finer, and that she could go about a week without shaving with little stubble. Hair continued to grow, and the report reflects one person’s experience.
Is the Nood Flasher Pro a laser device?
The review describes it as an IPL device, which uses broad-spectrum pulses of light. The report distinguishes this at-home technology from the professional laser treatments the writer had previously received.
How much did the reviewer spend on professional treatment?
She reported paying $3,600 plus tip for 16 sessions. That figure is her own stated cost, not a general price estimate for professional hair removal.
Who may not be a good candidate for at-home IPL?
The source says the device may work less well on blonde, red, or gray hair and warns of risks for people with deep or dark skin tones. Users should consult the device’s directions and seek professional guidance if unsure about suitability.
Does the review prove the device can replace professional treatments?
No. It reports a single reviewer’s results after about one month and does not establish long-term effectiveness or equivalence to professional treatment.
Source: marieclaire.com
